aluminum Household step ladder(14)

The US has started a trade investigation into the issue, and Mr Cohn said the US Trade Representative would be making recommendations about it soon.Asked about the potential for a trade war depending on US action over steel, aluminum and solar panels, Mr Trump said he hoped a trade war would not ensue.While Mr Trump did not specify what he meant by a “fine” against China, the 1974 trade law that authorised an investigation into China’s alleged theft of US intellectual property allows him to impose retaliatory tariffs on Chinese goods or other trade sanctions until China changes its policies.Mr Trump said he would be announcing some kind of action against China over trade and said he would discuss the issue during his State of the Union address to the US Congress on January 30.

I suspect the US measures will involve restrictions in areas where we don’t have WTO obligations,” Mr Schott said.The president said he wanted the US to have a good relationship with China, but Beijing needed to treat the US fairly. “We’re talking about big damages. We’re talking about numbers that you haven’t even thought about,” Mr Trump said.The president said he wanted the US to have a good relationship with China, but Beijing needed to treat the US fairly. “We have a very big intellectual property potential fine going, which is going to come out soon,” Mr Trump said in the interview.“At the same time, I want to stress that China will resolutely protect its legitimate rights,” he added, without elaborating.

But if there is, there is,” he said.“There is absolutely no government meddling in these actions,” Mr Kang told on Thursday. “I don’t think so, I hope not.US businesses say they lose hundreds of billions of dollars in technology and millions of jobs to Chinese firms which have stolen ideas and software or forced them to turn over intellectual property as part of the price of doing business in China..Mr Trump said the damages could be high, without elaborating on how the numbers were reached or how the costs would be imposed. Donald Trump (Photo: AP) famous aluminum platform ladder Washington: President Donald Trump said on Wednesday the United States was considering a big “fine” as part of a probe into China’s alleged theft of intellectual property, the clearest indication yet that his administration will take retaliatory trade action against China.In Beijing, foreign ministry spokesman Lu Kang said there were no laws in China to force foreign investors to transfer technology, but acknowledged such things may happen as part of “market behavior” between companies working with each other.

Jeffrey Schott, a senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics, said the penalties under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974, which authorised the investigation into China’s intellectual property practices, would probably include a package of both tariffs and restrictions on Chinese investment in the US.In an interview with Reuters, Mr Trump and his economic adviser Gary Cohn said China had forced US companies to transfer their intellectual property to China as a cost of doing business there

"A user can change the functionality of the modular electromechanical device based upon the different functional modules that are connected," read the summary portion of the somewhat cryptic paperwork filed with US patent officials.If rumours are to be believed this would be Facebook first attempt to foray into smartphone and smart speaker production, against well established players such as Samsung, Apple and Google. According to the report, Pegatron has already kicked-off a pilot production of the device in its factories in China. famous Aluminum scaffolding tower Facebook could be working on a smart speaker equipped with a 15-inch touch display, reported DigiTimes

 According to the people familiar with its development, the device will be manufactured by Pegatron Technolgy and is likely set for release in the first quarter of 2018.The touted Touch panel to be featured by smart speaker will be supplied by LG Display, using in-cell technology.The touted Touch panel to be featured by smart speaker will be supplied by LG Display, using in-cell technology.A week ago, the social media was revealed to file a patent application in January for a mysterious "modular electromechanical device" that could have speakers, cameras, microphones, touchscreens, and displays. According to the report, Pegatron has already kicked-off a pilot production of the device in its factories in China. It will also sport a magnesium-aluminum-alloy chassis

Mr Hooda, who is considered a member of the inner circle of Congress general secretary Rahul Gandhi, won fulsome praise from Prime Minister Manmohan Singh after the Opposition motion against the government decision was defeated. “They are not fools, they will sell to the person who gives them the best price,” asserted Mr Hooda. Countering Ms Swaraj’s claims that McDonald’s buys its potatoes from outside, Mr Hooda said the multi-national giant buys most potatoes from India.Young Congress MP from Rohtak Deepender Hooda on Wednesday presented a spirited defence of the government’s decision to allow FDI in multi-brand retail during the debate in the Lok Sabha.

Young Congress MP from Rohtak Deepender Hooda on Wednesday presented a spirited defence of the government’s decision to allow FDI in multi-brand retail during the debate in the Lok Sabha. Claiming to be a member of the farming community, Mr Hooda said FDI in retail would give farmers an alternative. “I know FDI will not solve all the problems of farmers. Taking on Leader of the Opposition Sushma Swaraj, Mr Hooda said the BJP is opposing FDI in retail because it is a UPA government move. He contested Ms Swaraj’s claims on her home town Ambala by questioning whether she he had exactly been to Ambala in recent days.

That state has the most McDonald’s stores. I am the son for a farmer. I understand their problems,” said Mr Hooda, while cautioning the Opposition not to underestimate the farmer of India.. “Sushmaji spoke of being from Ambala but I think she has not been to Ambala in quite some time. There are kirana stores that co-exist with multi-brand retail chains,” he said. “We found out where McDonald’s buys its potatoes from — most come from Gujarat. But it gives them famous Fiberglass insulated ladder suppliers an option. But as soon as this potato comes out of the ground, the BJP is quick to term it American,” he stated

In short, therefore, the best of the IAF’s operational plans to prepare for a “war on two fronts” is likely to emerge as a theory; and in its worst form, perhaps as a bad dream. Over 110 are still in service. The 250-plus Q-5 ground attack/strike fighters have been in use for 46 years, since 1970.It must be remembered that the IAF is only an operator/user of the imported flying machines, and can’t be expected to produce or manufacture aircraft on its own. Beijing was forced to transform from being an aircraft importer to an aircraft exporter.The writer is an alumnus of the National Defence College. Since a “two-front” situation could be more than a probability in the near future, it is more than necessary to delve into China’s air capability to understand its psyche.

Again, 37 years ago, Anglo-French (deep penetration) Jaguar IS ground attack/strike aircraft were delivered.Despite the deployment of these 36 advanced fighters three years from now, block obsolescence is unlikely to evaporate as a number of other obsolete aircraft, still in use with IAF squadrons, will definitely be retiring by then. This apart, various types of MiG-21 Bison and MiG-29 aircraft have also been upgraded from time to time.Second, let’s do a reality check.In comparison to the IAF, one is well aware of the strength and fleet age of the Pakistan Air Force.

Two squadrons of J-8B interceptor/air defence fighters are being operated for 28 years, since 1988. The transformation led to the Chinese induction of J-10A Meng Long multi-role fighters in 2001; J-7G and J-8F fighters in 2003; JH-7A ground attack/strike fighters in 2004 and J-10B multi-role fighters in 2009. That is the bottomline.Over 80 Soviet-origin MiG-29 (Fulcrum-A) are still going strong, serving India since their first induction 30 years ago, in 1986. Around 52 years later, this rock-solid Indian transporter still flies through the air turbulence of varying intensity and unpredictable velocity at remote airports across India. After 31 years, they are still the backbone of the IAF’s offensive operations. For this, as a conscientious citizen of India, I would like to hold successive rulers of our country culpable, for over the past two decades, for their inability to lead, give direction, take decisions, and look beyond horizon on what it takes a nation of 1.The sole point of “pride” of India’s indigenous aviation enterprise could be HAL’s Avro 748-M, first inducted into the IAF way back in 1964. The Chinese too, of course, have an obsolete fleet in their inventory.

A sustainable performance, and a fair-fight capability, needs at least a 30,000-pound static thrust engine. The views expressed here are personal. The first of 40-plus French Mirage-2000 interceptor and air defence planes came to India in 1985..Amid such a variety of vintage aircraft, the only “modern” multi-role IAF fighter continues to be the Sukhoi-30 MKI, first delivered in 2002. Yes, every conscientious Indian needs to know it. The only India-produced light combat aircraft, Tejas, is still going through trials and tests. It’s time to wake up and prepare to take on the Chinese by emulating their techniques.India will thus have to give top priority to the building of aircraft body (fuselage) and engines in its indigenisation programme to enhance the Air Force’s capabilities. Why Because 36 aircraft means only two squadrons, and these can’t be operational before 2019! It’s yet another case of “too little, too late”. Just imagine! 43 years on, it is still airborne Thanks to the IAF’s professionalism.